Life-sustaining treatment decisions in Portuguese intensive care units: a national survey of intensive care physicians
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION The objective of the present study was to evaluate the opinion of Portuguese intensive care physicians regarding 'do-not-resuscitate' (DNR) orders and decisions to withhold/withdraw treatment. METHODS A questionnaire was sent to all physicians working on a full-time basis in all intensive care units (ICUs) registered with the Portuguese Intensive Care Society. RESULTS A total of 266 questionnaires were sent and 175 (66%) were returned. Physicians from 79% of the ICUs participated. All participants stated that DNR orders are applied in their units, and 98.3% stated that decisions to withhold treatment and 95.4% stated that decisions to withdraw treatment are also applied. About three quarters indicated that only the medical group makes these decisions. Fewer than 15% of the responders stated that they involve nurses, 9% involve patients and fewer than 11% involve patients' relatives in end-of-life decisions. Physicians with more than 10 years of clinical experience more frequently indicated that they involve nurses in these decisions (P < 0.05), and agnostic/atheist doctors more frequently involve patients' relatives in decisions to withhold/withdraw treatment (P < 0.05). When asked about who they thought should be involved, more than 26% indicated nurses, more than 35% indicated the patient and more than 25% indicated patients' relatives. More experienced doctors more frequently felt that nurses should be involved (P < 0.05), and male doctors more frequently stated that patients' relatives should be involved in DNR orders (P < 0.05). When a decision to withdraw treatment is made, 76.8% of 151 respondents indicated that they would initiate palliative care; no respondent indicated that they would administer drugs to accelerate the expected outcome. CONCLUSION The probability of survival from the acute episode and patients' wishes were the most important criteria influencing end-of-life decisions. These decisions are made only by the medical group in most of the responding ICUs, with little input from nursing staff, patients, or patients' relatives, although many respondents expressed a wish to involve them more in this process. Sex, experience and religious beliefs of the respondents influences the way in which these decisions are made.
منابع مشابه
Respiratory support withdrawal in intensive care units: families, physicians and nurses views on two hypothetical clinical scenarios
INTRODUCTION Evidence suggests that dying patients' physical and emotional suffering is inadequately treated in intensive care units. Although there are recommendations regarding decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy, deciding on withdrawal of life support is difficult, and it is also difficult to decide who should participate in this decision. METHODS We distributed a self-administered ...
متن کاملDecision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses
BACKGROUND In the last 20 years, the chances for intact survival for extremely preterm infants have increased in high income countries. Decisions about withholding or withdrawing intensive care remain a major challenge in infants born at the limits of viability. Shared decision-making regarding these fragile infants between health care professionals and parents has become the preferred model to...
متن کاملThe role of advance directives in end-of-life decisions in Austria: survey of intensive care physicians
BACKGROUND Currently, intensive care medicine strives to define a generally accepted way of dealing with end-of-life decisions, therapy limitation and therapy discontinuation.In 2006 a new advance directive legislation was enacted in Austria. Patients may now document their personal views regarding extension of treatment. The aim of this survey was to explore Austrian intensive care physicians'...
متن کاملWithholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: the necessity of discrepancies in ethical reasoning
Observations can be proposed regarding the study by Rydvall and Lynöe [1]. The use of standardised questionnaires in the general population measures the intention of the persons interviewed but not the reality of reasoning in a concrete clinical situation. Most studies report that factors such as proxy comprehension and symptoms of anxiety or depression are major determinants of medical end-of-...
متن کاملEthical issues in the treatment of extremely low birth weight neonates
During their everyday work in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), physicians face many ethical dilemmas. Modern technology increases the chances of survival even of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) newborns, with a minimum number of complications. In countries with guides and expert group recommendations, neonatologists’ decisions on limiting or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment (...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Critical Care
دوره 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003